Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HBASE-28819 CanaryTool: Create canary tables in different RSgroup and… #6235

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

1458451310
Copy link
Contributor

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 41s Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 💚 dupname 0m 0s No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗 codespell 0m 0s codespell was not available.
+0 🆗 detsecrets 0m 0s detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚 @author 0m 0s The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 💚 hbaseanti 0m 0s Patch does not have any anti-patterns.
_ master Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 5m 0s master passed
+1 💚 compile 4m 24s master passed
+1 💚 checkstyle 0m 46s master passed
+1 💚 spotbugs 2m 13s master passed
+1 💚 spotless 1m 5s branch has no errors when running spotless:check.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 4m 37s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 4m 44s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 4m 44s the patch passed
+1 💚 blanks 0m 0s The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚 checkstyle 1m 2s the patch passed
-1 ❌ spotbugs 2m 40s /new-spotbugs-hbase-server.html hbase-server generated 1 new + 0 unchanged - 0 fixed = 1 total (was 0)
+1 💚 hadoopcheck 17m 7s Patch does not cause any errors with Hadoop 3.3.6 3.4.0.
+1 💚 spotless 1m 14s patch has no errors when running spotless:check.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 asflicense 0m 14s The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
56m 23s
Reason Tests
SpotBugs module:hbase-server
Possible null pointer dereference of canaryTableList in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.tool.CanaryTool$RegionMonitor.run() Dereferenced at CanaryTool.java:canaryTableList in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.tool.CanaryTool$RegionMonitor.run() Dereferenced at CanaryTool.java:[line 1539]
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.43 ServerAPI=1.43 base: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-6235/1/artifact/yetus-general-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #6235
Optional Tests dupname asflicense javac codespell detsecrets spotless spotbugs checkstyle compile hadoopcheck hbaseanti
uname Linux 8c84d5e32b60 5.4.0-1103-aws #111~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 23 20:04:10 UTC 2023 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision master / 6107dff
Default Java Eclipse Adoptium-17.0.11+9
Max. process+thread count 84 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-server U: hbase-server
Console output https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-6235/1/console
versions git=2.34.1 maven=3.9.8 spotbugs=4.7.3
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.15.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

@Apache-HBase
Copy link

🎊 +1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Logfile Comment
+0 🆗 reexec 0m 42s Docker mode activated.
-0 ⚠️ yetus 0m 3s Unprocessed flag(s): --brief-report-file --spotbugs-strict-precheck --author-ignore-list --blanks-eol-ignore-file --blanks-tabs-ignore-file --quick-hadoopcheck
_ Prechecks _
_ master Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 3m 9s master passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 59s master passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 31s master passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 5m 17s branch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚 mvninstall 2m 55s the patch passed
+1 💚 compile 0m 58s the patch passed
+1 💚 javac 0m 58s the patch passed
+1 💚 javadoc 0m 29s the patch passed
+1 💚 shadedjars 5m 16s patch has no errors when building our shaded downstream artifacts.
_ Other Tests _
+1 💚 unit 224m 43s hbase-server in the patch passed.
249m 40s
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker ClientAPI=1.47 ServerAPI=1.47 base: https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-6235/1/artifact/yetus-jdk17-hadoop3-check/output/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #6235
Optional Tests javac javadoc unit compile shadedjars
uname Linux 59a9391a1fbf 5.4.0-186-generic #206-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 26 12:31:10 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality dev-support/hbase-personality.sh
git revision master / 6107dff
Default Java Eclipse Adoptium-17.0.11+9
Test Results https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-6235/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 4642 (vs. ulimit of 30000)
modules C: hbase-server U: hbase-server
Console output https://ci-hbase.apache.org/job/HBase-PreCommit-GitHub-PR/job/PR-6235/1/console
versions git=2.34.1 maven=3.9.8
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.15.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

Copy link
Contributor

@Apache9 Apache9 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What if you remove a rsgroup? Will we delete the canary table for this rsgroup?

@@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ public void publishReadTiming(String znode, String server, long msTime) {
*/
public static class RegionStdOutSink extends StdOutSink {
private Map<String, LongAdder> perTableReadLatency = new HashMap<>();
private Map<String, LongAdder> perTableWriteLatency = new HashMap<>();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we still need to global writeLatency below?

@@ -1131,8 +1134,8 @@ private void printUsageAndExit() {
System.err.println(" -f <B> exit on first error; default=true");
System.err.println(" -failureAsError treat read/write failure as error");
System.err.println(" -t <N> timeout for canary-test run; default=600000ms");
System.err.println(" -writeSniffing enable write sniffing");
System.err.println(" -writeTable the table used for write sniffing; default=hbase:canary");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not think we should remove this flag? People may want to use this flag to specify a different write table for canary

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants