This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 29, 2020. It is now read-only.
  
  
  - 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 270
MJAVADOC-485 Upgrade to commons-lang3 #119
          
     Open
      
      
            marschall
  wants to merge
  1
  commit into
  apache:trunk
  
    
      
        
          
  
    
      Choose a base branch
      
     
    
      
        
      
      
        
          
          
        
        
          
            
              
              
              
  
           
        
        
          
            
              
              
           
        
       
     
  
        
          
            
          
            
          
        
       
    
      
from
marschall:MJAVADOC-485
  
      
      
   
  
    
  
  
  
 
  
      
    base: trunk
Could not load branches
            
              
  
    Branch not found: {{ refName }}
  
            
                
      Loading
              
            Could not load tags
            
            
              Nothing to show
            
              
  
            
                
      Loading
              
            Are you sure you want to change the base?
            Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
            and old review comments may become outdated.
          
          
  
     Open
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
  File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This raises an exception when building the project on 9+175 (with
mvn clean verify -Prun-itsfor example)This method is intended to parse the output of
javadoc -J-fullversionand it works for Javadoc 9+175 (output beingjava full version "9+175"). I think a newfloat parseJavaVersion(String)is needed, that works for the output ofjava -version. Or perhaps we should get rid of all those float comparisons and rely on Commons LangJavaVersion(andatLeast).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Tunaki Unfortunately,
JavaVersionworks with floats too. How will this make it any better? Moreover, on needs to extract the version string first before passing toJavaVersion.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@michael-o I just noticed there is a new
Runtime.Versionclass in Java 9 which can parse and compare Java version strings. Do you think we can use with reflection in place ofJavaVersion?But as far as upgrading to commons-lang3, having a new method
float parseJavaVersion(String), that is similar toparseJavadocVersionbut with the regex being([0-9]+\\.?[0-9]*)(\\.([0-9]+)), looks like the way to go. We can look at usingRuntime.Versionor not later.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wouldn't use it for two reasons:
We can of course add more logic to Commons Lang parsing arbitrary strings from 6 to 9.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Tunaki refactoring to
JavaVersionwould also have been my preference but that's tricky for two reasonsAbstractJavadocMojo.versionis Maven container injected, I don't know how we could customise the injection process Mapping Complex Objects does not seem to be a solutionAbstractJavadocMojo.addStandardDocletOptions.Initially I copy and pasted the parsing code from commons-lang 2.6 but that was quite a bit of code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we need to get rid of the float, in the end it will cause issues (java versions were never floats). Instead we need a Comparable JavaVersion (just like Aether/Artifact Resolver has). Is should be as simple as parsing the String to a JavaVersion instance and use its compareTo.