[SPARK-51097] [SS] Re-introduce RocksDB state store's last uploaded snapshot version instance metrics #50195
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SPARK-51097
#50161 recently had to revert the changes in #49816 due to instance metrics showing up on SparkUI, causing excessive clutter. This PR aims to re-introduce the new instance metrics while incorporating the fix in #50157.
The main difference between this and the original PR are:
Line-by-line:
Before the fix (note that metrics are sorted lexicographically):

After including the fix:

Why are the changes needed?
From #49816:
There's currently a lack of observability into state store specific maintenance information, notably metrics of the last snapshot version uploaded. This affects the ability to identify performance degradation issues behind maintenance tasks and more as described in SPARK-51097.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
From #49816:
There will be some new metrics displayed from StreamingQueryProgress:
How was this patch tested?
Five tests are added to RocksDBStateStoreIntegrationSuite:
I additionally manually verified these metrics on SparkUI (refer to screenshots above with and without the fix)
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.