Skip to content

Conversation

@gaogaotiantian
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Parallelized some operations in the test.

Why are the changes needed?

The test takes ~80s which is the second longest test case we have. Having some parallelism will reduce about 50% of the time it takes.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

Test passed locally. Time consumed 64s -> 28s.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2026

JIRA Issue Information

=== Test SPARK-54958 ===
Summary: Accelerate test_cv_io_pipeline.py
Assignee: None
Status: Open
Affected: ["4.2.0"]


This comment was automatically generated by GitHub Actions

@zhengruifeng zhengruifeng changed the title [SPARK-54958][PYTHON][TEST] Accelerate test_cv_io_pipeline.py [SPARK-54958][PYTHON][ML][TEST] Accelerate test_cv_io_pipeline.py Jan 9, 2026
@zhengruifeng
Copy link
Contributor

merged to master

@gaogaotiantian gaogaotiantian deleted the optimize-cv-io-pipeline branch January 9, 2026 07:14
Yicong-Huang pushed a commit to Yicong-Huang/spark that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2026
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Parallelized some operations in the test.

### Why are the changes needed?

The test takes ~80s which is the second longest test case we have. Having some parallelism will reduce about 50% of the time it takes.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No

### How was this patch tested?

Test passed locally. Time consumed 64s -> 28s.

### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No

Closes apache#53725 from gaogaotiantian/optimize-cv-io-pipeline.

Authored-by: Tian Gao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Zheng <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants