Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BYOC][NNAPI] Add NNAPI backend for BYOC #17385

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mengshyu
Copy link
Contributor

@mengshyu mengshyu commented Sep 18, 2024

[RFC-109] Add a new backend NNAPI for BYOC

This PR introduces a new BYOC backend for Android Neural Networks API (NNAPI), enabling execution of neural networks on custom accelerators. This feature adds a new codegen and runtime for NNAPI, supporting operations such as element-wise ops, nn.dense, and nn.conv2d for CNN model with static shape.

Co-authored-by: Ming-Long Huang [email protected]
Co-authored-by: HMZ [email protected]

@mengshyu mengshyu force-pushed the fea/nnapi branch 2 times, most recently from 64b52e1 to b5c1ed4 Compare September 20, 2024 15:03
@mengshyu mengshyu changed the title [BYOC][NNAPI] This PR intorduce NNAPI to TVM [BYOC][NNAPI] Add NNAPI backend for BYOC Sep 20, 2024
This PR introduces a new BYOC backend for Android Neural Networks API (NNAPI),
enabling execution of neural networks on custom accelerators. This feature adds
a new codegen and runtime for NNAPI, supporting operations such as element-wise
ops, nn.dense, and nn.conv2d for CNN model with static shape.

Co-authored-by: Ming-Long Huang <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: HMZ <[email protected]>
@mengshyu mengshyu marked this pull request as ready for review September 20, 2024 20:29
@tqchen tqchen merged commit 2a87c4c into apache:main Sep 24, 2024
15 checks passed
@tqchen
Copy link
Member

tqchen commented Sep 24, 2024

Thank you @mengshyu ! this is now merged

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants