[CI] Update image tag to 20240917-153130-9f281758

[mshr-h]

As per title.
Part of #17346

[tqchen]

looks like a flaky error, we should increas atol and rtol for the case

[mshr-h]

• https://ci.tlcpack.ai/blue/organizations/jenkins/tvm-unity/detail/PR-17397/1/pipeline/
  • tests/python/relax/test_frontend_onnx.py:test_all_reduce_funcs is failed due to flakiness
  • increased rtol from 1e-7 to 1e-4
• https://ci.tlcpack.ai/blue/organizations/jenkins/tvm-gpu/detail/PR-17397/1/tests/
  • tests/python/frontend/pytorch/test_fx_quant.py:test_imagenet is failed
  • As we upgraded torchvision, the model binary is also updated but the binary isn't uploaded to S3
• https://ci.tlcpack.ai/blue/organizations/jenkins/tvm-hexagon/detail/PR-17397/1/pipeline/
  • ./tests/scripts/task_build_hexagon_api.sh: line 44: ANDROID_NDK_HOME: unbound variable
  • Failed to build because we removed Android SDK in [CI] Disable NNPACK build and fix error on Android SDK installaion #17337
• https://ci.tlcpack.ai/blue/organizations/jenkins/tvm-minimal/detail/PR-17397/2/pipeline/
  • tests/python/tir-transform/test_tir_transform_simplify.py:TestMostRestrictiveConditional
  • I have no idea to fix it.

[tqchen]

here is the error

[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z] self = <FixtureDef argname='test_case' scope='session' baseid='tests/python/tir-transform/test_tir_transform_simplify.py::TestMostRestrictiveConditional'>
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z] request = <SubRequest 'test_case' for <Function test_compare[test_case2]>>
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z] 
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]     def execute(self, request: SubRequest) -> FixtureValue:
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]         """Return the value of this fixture, executing it if not cached."""
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]         # Ensure that the dependent fixtures requested by this fixture are loaded.
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]         # This needs to be done before checking if we have a cached value, since
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]         # if a dependent fixture has their cache invalidated, e.g. due to
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]         # parametrization, they finalize themselves and fixtures depending on it
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]         # (which will likely include this fixture) setting `self.cached_result = None`.
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]         # See #4871
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]         requested_fixtures_that_should_finalize_us = []
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]         for argname in self.argnames:
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]             fixturedef = request._get_active_fixturedef(argname)
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]             # Saves requested fixtures in a list so we later can add our finalizer
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]             # to them, ensuring that if a requested fixture gets torn down we get torn
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]             # down first. This is generally handled by SetupState, but still currently
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]             # needed when this fixture is not parametrized but depends on a parametrized
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]             # fixture.
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]             if not isinstance(fixturedef, PseudoFixtureDef):
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]                 requested_fixtures_that_should_finalize_us.append(fixturedef)
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]     
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]         # Check for (and return) cached value/exception.
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]         if self.cached_result is not None:
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]             request_cache_key = self.cache_key(request)
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]             cache_key = self.cached_result[1]
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]             try:
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]                 # Attempt to make a normal == check: this might fail for objects
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z]                 # which do not implement the standard comparison (like numpy arrays -- #6497).
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z] >               cache_hit = bool(request_cache_key == cache_key)
[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z] E               TypeError: __bool__ should return bool, returned NotImplementedType

[tqchen]

[2024-09-21T07:06:36.974Z] E TypeError: __bool__ should return bool, returned NotImplementedType

Seems like a bug in pytest or our fixture impl cc @Lunderberg

[tqchen]

Some guess about what happens to the tests/python/tir-transform/test_tir_transform_simplify.py:TestMostRestrictiveConditional

This is the only test where all parameters appears as bool PrimExpr and also do not contain a bool constant, not sure how that impacts the comparison impl.

Update, i managed to create a case that hits the error

import tvm

i, j, k = [tvm.tir.Var(name, "int32") for name in "ijk"] 

((i == j), (i > j)) == ((i == j), (i > j))

raises

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: __bool__ should return bool, returned NotImplementedType

I can also reproduce the error via env

Note that the same failure happens in my python 3.10 env

[tqchen]

@yongwww can you help a bit with model binary

[mshr-h]

Python 3.8 is going to EoL in 2024-10, so maybe it's a good time to move to 3.9.

[tqchen]

Update about my finding. I find that i can reproduce the same issue on my python3.10 (the tuple comparison issue) but the testcase did not fail, then i digged a bit into pytest code. The pytest of my python3.10 do not have the same code as bool(cached_key == requested_key)

Seems it is a versioning problem. The pytest version was too old. Likely the reliance of bool(cached_key == requested_key) was fixed by a later version of pytest. So the main reason here likely was pytest version issue. We can likely fix it by update the pytest to a later version

On a separate note, i agree it is good time to move to higher python version.

[mshr-h]

The test passes with pytest==8.2.2, but it fails with pytest==8.3.3.
We can temporarily work around this issue by pinning pytest.

[tqchen]

Ah actually it has to do with newer pytest version. I see, then we should up find ways to fix the testcase

[tqchen]

I think one solution would be to add a wrapper class for the parameters of this testcase and define our own equal operator, so it won't rely on tuple equal. @mshr-h do you mind try that? We can use structural equality and hash for the wrapper key