Skip to content

Admin changes #3737

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Ulincsys wants to merge 22 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Merge branch 'main' into admin-changes

c8d3eb5
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Open

Admin changes #3737

Merge branch 'main' into admin-changes
c8d3eb5
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
GitHub Advanced Security / Bandit failed Feb 25, 2026 in 7s

12 new alerts including 1 error

New alerts in code changed by this pull request

  • 1 error
  • 11 notes

See annotations below for details.

View all branch alerts.

Annotations

Check failure on line 29 in scripts/control/restart.py

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / Bandit

subprocess call with shell=True identified, security issue. Error

subprocess call with shell=True identified, security issue.

Check notice on line 5 in augur/api/routes/admin.py

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / Bandit

Consider possible security implications associated with the subprocess module. Note

Consider possible security implications associated with the subprocess module.

Check notice on line 17 in augur/api/routes/admin.py

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / Bandit

subprocess call - check for execution of untrusted input. Note

subprocess call - check for execution of untrusted input.

Check notice on line 18 in augur/api/routes/admin.py

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / Bandit

Starting a process with a partial executable path Note

Starting a process with a partial executable path

Check notice on line 18 in augur/api/routes/admin.py

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / Bandit

subprocess call with shell=True seems safe, but may be changed in the future, consider rewriting without shell Note

subprocess call with shell=True seems safe, but may be changed in the future, consider rewriting without shell

Check notice on line 25 in augur/api/routes/admin.py

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / Bandit

Starting a process with a partial executable path Note

Starting a process with a partial executable path

Check notice on line 25 in augur/api/routes/admin.py

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / Bandit

subprocess call with shell=True seems safe, but may be changed in the future, consider rewriting without shell Note

subprocess call with shell=True seems safe, but may be changed in the future, consider rewriting without shell

Check notice on line 1 in scripts/control/restart.py

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / Bandit

Consider possible security implications associated with the subprocess module. Note

Consider possible security implications associated with the subprocess module.

Check notice on line 7 in scripts/control/restart.py

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / Bandit

Starting a process with a partial executable path Note

Starting a process with a partial executable path

Check notice on line 7 in scripts/control/restart.py

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / Bandit

subprocess call with shell=True seems safe, but may be changed in the future, consider rewriting without shell Note

subprocess call with shell=True seems safe, but may be changed in the future, consider rewriting without shell

Check notice on line 8 in scripts/control/restart.py

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / Bandit

Starting a process with a partial executable path Note

Starting a process with a partial executable path

Check notice on line 8 in scripts/control/restart.py

See this annotation in the file changed.

Code scanning / Bandit

subprocess call with shell=True seems safe, but may be changed in the future, consider rewriting without shell Note

subprocess call with shell=True seems safe, but may be changed in the future, consider rewriting without shell