Skip to content

(Purposefully failing) Add more tests for multi-scope #798

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

cbarlin
Copy link
Contributor

@cbarlin cbarlin commented Apr 11, 2025

Related to #793

This is an expansion of #797 to include both the currently passing case, and a few cases that currently fail. It also expands further the number of modules, and makes it a non-linear graph.

@cbarlin cbarlin changed the title (Purposefully failing) Add more tests for multi-scope DRAFT: (Purposefully failing) Add more tests for multi-scope Apr 11, 2025
@cbarlin cbarlin changed the title DRAFT: (Purposefully failing) Add more tests for multi-scope (Purposefully failing) Add more tests for multi-scope Apr 11, 2025
@cbarlin cbarlin marked this pull request as draft April 11, 2025 02:53
@SentryMan
Copy link
Collaborator

it strikes me that this might just be a bit of a runtime problem, that inject doesn't sort manually provided modules

@SentryMan SentryMan closed this Apr 11, 2025
@cbarlin cbarlin deleted the multiple_runtime_called_modules branch April 11, 2025 19:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants