docs: clarify TLS passthrough vs re-encryption in HTTPS guide#961
Merged
Conversation
liucalvin
force-pushed
the
liucalvin/tls-doc-update
branch
from
7b7e5e4 to
6950cb9
Compare
liucalvin
force-pushed
the
liucalvin/tls-doc-update
branch
from
6950cb9 to
1eb01c3
Compare
SinghVikram97
approved these changes
Jun 2, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
docs
Which issue does this PR fix:
n/a
What does this PR do / Why do we need it:
fixes docs to say that TLS passthrough is supported with a TLS listener
relevant lattice docs:
If an issue # is not available please add repro steps and logs from aws-gateway-controller showing the issue:
n/a
Testing done on this change:
mkdocs serveAutomation added to e2e:
none
Will this PR introduce any new dependencies?:
no
Will this break upgrades or downgrades. Has updating a running cluster been tested?:
no
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?:
no
Do all end-to-end tests successfully pass when running
make e2e-test?:n/a
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.