Skip to content

Added comments in migration tool for unsupported method #6018

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Fred1155
Copy link
Contributor

@Fred1155 Fred1155 commented Apr 8, 2025

Motivation and Context

Some S3 method will not be supported in migration tool and will require manually migration. This change added comments before those method to address that. Once the dec guide is updated on how to manually migrate those method, the link to the dev guide will be added in future PR.

Modifications

Added method name check in S3NonStreamingRequestToV2.java recipe

Testing

Changed the test cases in integration test

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • Local run of mvn install succeeds
  • My code follows the code style of this project
  • My change requires a change to the Javadoc documentation
  • I have updated the Javadoc documentation accordingly
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests passed
  • I have added a changelog entry. Adding a new entry must be accomplished by running the scripts/new-change script and following the instructions. Commit the new file created by the script in .changes/next-release with your changes.
  • My change is to implement 1.11 parity feature and I have updated LaunchChangelog

License

  • I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license

@Fred1155 Fred1155 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 8, 2025 22:05
@@ -199,12 +199,12 @@ public void requestconstructor() {
.build());

//INCOMPATIBLE RESPONSE
Copy link
Contributor

@joviegas joviegas Apr 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the newly added comment is single line can we use// Single-line comment for the new comment added

@@ -199,12 +199,12 @@ public void requestconstructor() {
.build());

//INCOMPATIBLE RESPONSE
s3.getBucketAccelerateConfiguration(GetBucketAccelerateConfigurationRequest.builder().bucket(bucketName)
Copy link
Contributor

@joviegas joviegas Apr 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why does V1 style from /before/

        s3.getBucketAccelerateConfiguration(new GetBucketAccelerateConfigurationRequest(bucketName));

gets converted to V2 when it says Transform is not supported ?

Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants