Add Isort Checks for CI

[ParagEkbote]

Issue #1984

Description of changes: Added Isort for CI.

Testing done:

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

General

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
• I certify that the changes I am introducing will be backward compatible, and I have discussed concerns about this, if any, with the Python SDK team
• I used the commit message format described in CONTRIBUTING
• I have passed the region in to all S3 and STS clients that I've initialized as part of this change.
• I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs and API docs (if appropriate)

Tests

• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if appropriate)
• I have added unit and/or integration tests as appropriate to ensure backward compatibility of the changes
• I have checked that my tests are not configured for a specific region or account (if appropriate)
• I have used unique_name_from_base to create resource names in integ tests (if appropriate)
• If adding any dependency in requirements.txt files, I have spell checked and ensured they exist in PyPi

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

[ParagEkbote]

Could anyone please review this PR?

cc: @mollyheamazon

[ParagEkbote]

Could you please review?

cc: @sage-maker

[sage-maker]

Can you provide a justification for this change?

[ParagEkbote]

Can you provide a justification for this change?

As described in this issue, I have add isort checks to tox.

isort --check-only --diff . command only shows the diff when linting with isort

isort . command lints the files.

Could you please review?

cc: @sage-maker

[sage-maker]

Please fix

[ParagEkbote]

I have add the missing isort dependency to tox. Could you please review?

cc: @sage-maker

[sage-maker]

You will still fail the CodeQL checks, please fix thanks

[sage-maker]

Please fix CodeQL