Skip to content

Conversation

aboroska
Copy link

@aboroska aboroska commented Sep 6, 2019

An Erlang developer expects the atoms in options to denote the true
boolean value. So, when keepalive is in the options we expect that
keepalive feature is turned on.

In theory this is a backward incompatible change but in practice I cannot
imagine anyone setting [keepalive, ...] and expecting [{keepalive, false}, ...] which is the default anyway.

An Erlang developer expects the atoms in options to denote the `true`
boolean value. So, when `keepalive` is in the options we expect that
keepalive feature is turned on.

In theory this is a backward incompatible change but in practice I cannot
imagine anyone setting `[keepalive, ...]` and expecting `[{keepalive, false},
...]` which is the default anyway.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant