Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add compatibility ICM42688 support for some NEUTRONRC FC. #702

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Linjieqiang
Copy link
Contributor

  • NEUTRONRCH7BT
  • NEUTRONRCH743AIO
  • NEUTRONRCF745
  • NEUTRONRCF722AIO
  • NEUTRONRCF745VTX

NEUTRONRCH7BT
NEUTRONRCH743AIO
NEUTRONRCF745
NEUTRONRCF722AIO
NEUTRONRCF745VTX
@ot0tot
Copy link
Contributor

ot0tot commented Feb 26, 2025

The ICM42688p is not a direct swap, and requires a separate LDO and clean power. Have these FCs been revised appropriately?

@Linjieqiang
Copy link
Contributor Author

At present, our FC products, regardless of any IMU sensor, use LDO independent power supply to ensure the stability of IMU operation. Please rest assured.

@nerdCopter
Copy link
Member

i don's think the comment text // For ICM42688P variation is necessary.

Copy link
Member

@haslinghuis haslinghuis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Betaflight cannot add support for this without having reviewed schematics and tested samples.

@sugaarK
Copy link
Member

sugaarK commented Feb 27, 2025

Betaflight cannot add support for this without having reviewed schematics and tested samples.

this !!!

@guowei681
Copy link

Betaflight cannot add support for this without having reviewed schematics and tested samples.

Hi, is there any way I should send the schematic for review as well as send samples, thanks!

@haslinghuis
Copy link
Member

@guowei681 please check your manufacturer channel on our discord

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants