-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
Update PR 115 (BSIP48) modify_max_supply #216
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
jmjatlanta
wants to merge
11
commits into
bsips-issuer-asset-disable-modify-max-supply
Choose a base branch
from
jmj_allow_modify_max_supply
base: bsips-issuer-asset-disable-modify-max-supply
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6a51733
switch flag name to enable
jmjatlanta 03d5a93
fix typos, revert flag name
jmjatlanta b93d081
Add disable_issue flag
jmjatlanta 0d8e38d
Add changing precision
jmjatlanta 0c8b60b
Fix typos, add some clarity
jmjatlanta 79e4f19
Addition to specifications, risks sections
jmjatlanta b136220
Add new_precision to extension
jmjatlanta 2a82116
Clarifications and fixes
jmjatlanta a6feb61
Added paragraph about ICO use case
jmjatlanta 0fdb3b0
Clarify permissions and flags
jmjatlanta 858b7ee
Fix flags/permissions, positive logic
jmjatlanta File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you have mixed up the meaning of permissions and flags.
This negative logic puts knots in my brain just from reading the BSIP. It will also be a PITA to implement. I think we should move these flags to positive logic. How many clients for creating assets are out there that might break?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All clients.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think requiring clients to upgrade is better than being forever stuck with this twisted logic.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I clarified my permissions/flags statement. Please check. I have also switched to using positive logic. See 858b7ee
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it's the way to go.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree here. If that twists user's minds we can present it positively in UI