Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove vendor-risk in project overview #847

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

eieimon
Copy link
Contributor

@eieimon eieimon commented Feb 24, 2025

Describe your changes

  • Remove vendor-risk tab
  • Remove vendor-risk summary

Issue number

Mention the issue number(s) this PR addresses (e.g., #834).

Please ensure all items are checked off before requesting a review:

  • I deployed the code locally.
  • I have performed a self-review of my code.
  • I have included the issue # in the PR.
  • I have labelled the PR correctly.
  • The issue I am working on is assigned to me.
  • I didn't use any hardcoded values (otherwise it will not scale, and will make it difficult to maintain consistency across the application).
  • I made sure font sizes, color choices etc are all referenced from the theme.
  • My PR is granular and targeted to one specific feature.
  • I took a screenshot or a video and attached to this PR if there is a UI change.
Screenshot 2025-02-24 at 12 33 45 PM

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Simplified the project view by removing vendor risk details.
    • The overview now focuses solely on project risks, with the vendor risks navigation tab eliminated to streamline the interface.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request removes all vendor risks functionality from the project views. The Overview component no longer accepts or renders the vendorRisksSummary prop, and the "Vendor risks" tab has been removed from the ProjectView component. The changes streamline the user interface to focus exclusively on project risks while eliminating redundant code related to vendor risks.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
Clients/src/presentation/pages/ProjectView/Overview/index.tsx
Clients/src/presentation/pages/ProjectView/index.tsx
Removed vendor risks functionality: the vendorRisksSummary property and its usage were eliminated from the Overview component, and the "Vendor risks" tab was removed from ProjectView.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant ProjectView
    participant Overview

    User->>ProjectView: Open Project View
    ProjectView->>Overview: Render Overview with projectRisksSummary
    Overview-->>User: Display project risks section only
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

frontend, bug

Suggested reviewers

  • MuhammadKhalilzadeh
  • gorkem-bwl

Poem

I'm a bunny with a coding hop,
Vendor risks hopped away—no more to swap!
The tabs now skip the needless chore,
Leaving room for project risks galore.
With a twitch of my nose and a joyful leap,
I celebrate cleaner code that’s ours to keep!
🥕🐇

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Clients/src/presentation/pages/ProjectView/Overview/index.tsx (1)

134-137: Remove unused placeholder Stack component.

This empty Stack component appears to be a leftover placeholder after removing the vendor risks section. Consider removing it to maintain clean code.

-        <Stack
-          sx={{ minWidth: 228, width: "100%", p: "8px 36px 14px 14px" }}
-        ></Stack>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 09f62a8 and 3b4302b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Clients/src/presentation/pages/ProjectView/Overview/index.tsx (2 hunks)
  • Clients/src/presentation/pages/ProjectView/index.tsx (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • Clients/src/presentation/pages/ProjectView/index.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Clients/src/presentation/pages/ProjectView/Overview/index.tsx (3)

19-21: LGTM! Clean interface update.

The OverviewProps interface has been correctly simplified to only include projectRisksSummary, aligning with the PR objective of removing vendor risks functionality.


29-29: LGTM! Props updated consistently.

The component signature has been properly updated to match the interface changes, maintaining consistency throughout the codebase.


1-151:

❓ Verification inconclusive

Verify complete removal of vendor risks references.

Let's ensure all vendor risks references have been removed from related files.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to vendor risks
rg -i "vendor.?risk" --type ts --type tsx

Length of output: 71


Vendor Risk References: Manual Verification Required

The initial search command encountered an error due to an unrecognized file type ("tsx"). Please re-run the check using proper file glob patterns to capture both TypeScript and TSX files. For example, execute:

rg -i "vendor.?risk" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"

This will help ensure that no remaining references to vendor risks exist in the codebase. Once confirmed manually, you can be confident that the vendor risk references have been fully removed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant