Skip to content

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Nov 19, 2019

Bumps stringstream from 0.0.5 to 0.0.6.

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot ignore this [patch|minor|major] version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor/major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot use these labels will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these reviewers will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these assignees will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use this milestone will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language

You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Nov 19, 2019
@kylemhall kylemhall force-pushed the bywater-v19.05.04-07 branch 24 times, most recently from 9ee3246 to 72cce82 Compare November 22, 2019 14:09
ricofreak pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2025
What this patch does is:
1 - Wraps the existing search code in a a "bool" compound query as a "must". This should not affect
    relevancy or results of the existing searches.
2 - Before we clean/truncate terms, loop through the passed in search terms and indexes to build a
    new 'should' query, using the 'match' on the specified index/field that is added to the 'bool' query from above.
    This means that if a result from the original query is also returned here, that item will be boosted in the result.
    For searches on 'keyword' or 'title', or if no index is set, we use 'title-cover' as the most narrow form of title

This query isn't going to help when users enter CCL (i.e. ti:To die for) and it won't boost titles from 505, series, etc
when doing a general search. Nor will it have a detrimental effect, it will only boost field matches

To test:
1 - Add a record with
    245 $a novel
2 - Add a record with
    245 $a A novel : $b about things / $c by me
3 - Search for: novel
    - Above records are returned lower in the list (results #6 and #14 for me)
4 - Search for: a novel
    - Above records are returned lower in the list (results #6 and #14 for me)
5 - Apply patch, restart all, enable ESBoostFieldMatch option
6 - Repeat searches, note exact titles are boosted
    - For 'novel' record from #1 is #1 result and other is second
    - For 'a novel' record form #2 is #1 result and other is third
7 - Disable the new pref and repeat steps 3 and 4 and get results as before patch
8 - Experiment with other searches, turning pref on and off to verify relevant titles are boosted when enabled
9 - Search results when disabled should return as before the patch

Signed-off-by: Matthias Meusburger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Klausner <[email protected]>
kylemhall pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2025
What this patch does is:
1 - Wraps the existing search code in a a "bool" compound query as a "must". This should not affect
    relevancy or results of the existing searches.
2 - Before we clean/truncate terms, loop through the passed in search terms and indexes to build a
    new 'should' query, using the 'match' on the specified index/field that is added to the 'bool' query from above.
    This means that if a result from the original query is also returned here, that item will be boosted in the result.
    For searches on 'keyword' or 'title', or if no index is set, we use 'title-cover' as the most narrow form of title

This query isn't going to help when users enter CCL (i.e. ti:To die for) and it won't boost titles from 505, series, etc
when doing a general search. Nor will it have a detrimental effect, it will only boost field matches

To test:
1 - Add a record with
    245 $a novel
2 - Add a record with
    245 $a A novel : $b about things / $c by me
3 - Search for: novel
    - Above records are returned lower in the list (results #6 and #14 for me)
4 - Search for: a novel
    - Above records are returned lower in the list (results #6 and #14 for me)
5 - Apply patch, restart all, enable ESBoostFieldMatch option
6 - Repeat searches, note exact titles are boosted
    - For 'novel' record from #1 is #1 result and other is second
    - For 'a novel' record form #2 is #1 result and other is third
7 - Disable the new pref and repeat steps 3 and 4 and get results as before patch
8 - Experiment with other searches, turning pref on and off to verify relevant titles are boosted when enabled
9 - Search results when disabled should return as before the patch

Signed-off-by: Matthias Meusburger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Klausner <[email protected]>
kylemhall pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2025
What this patch does is:
1 - Wraps the existing search code in a a "bool" compound query as a "must". This should not affect
    relevancy or results of the existing searches.
2 - Before we clean/truncate terms, loop through the passed in search terms and indexes to build a
    new 'should' query, using the 'match' on the specified index/field that is added to the 'bool' query from above.
    This means that if a result from the original query is also returned here, that item will be boosted in the result.
    For searches on 'keyword' or 'title', or if no index is set, we use 'title-cover' as the most narrow form of title

This query isn't going to help when users enter CCL (i.e. ti:To die for) and it won't boost titles from 505, series, etc
when doing a general search. Nor will it have a detrimental effect, it will only boost field matches

To test:
1 - Add a record with
    245 $a novel
2 - Add a record with
    245 $a A novel : $b about things / $c by me
3 - Search for: novel
    - Above records are returned lower in the list (results #6 and #14 for me)
4 - Search for: a novel
    - Above records are returned lower in the list (results #6 and #14 for me)
5 - Apply patch, restart all, enable ESBoostFieldMatch option
6 - Repeat searches, note exact titles are boosted
    - For 'novel' record from #1 is #1 result and other is second
    - For 'a novel' record form #2 is #1 result and other is third
7 - Disable the new pref and repeat steps 3 and 4 and get results as before patch
8 - Experiment with other searches, turning pref on and off to verify relevant titles are boosted when enabled
9 - Search results when disabled should return as before the patch

Signed-off-by: Matthias Meusburger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Klausner <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant