docs(migration-tooling): code conversion: update / move docs from repo

[venetrius]

related to: camunda/camunda-7-to-8-migration-tooling/issues/415

Description

When should this change go live?

• This is a bug fix, security concern, or something that needs urgent release support. (add bug or support label)
• This is already available but undocumented and should be released within a week. (add available & undocumented label)
• This is on a specific schedule and the assignee will coordinate a release with the Documentation team. (create draft PR and/or add hold label)
• This is part of a scheduled alpha or minor. (add alpha or minor label)
• There is no urgency with this change (add low prio label)

PR Checklist

• The commit history of this PR is cleaned up, using {type}(scope): {description} commit message(s)

• My changes are for an upcoming minor release and are in the /docs directory (version 8.9).
• My changes are for an already released minor and are in a /versioned_docs directory.

• I added a DRI, team, or delegate as a reviewer for technical accuracy and grammar/style:
  • Engineering team review
  • Technical writer review via @camunda/tech-writers unless working with an embedded writer.

[mesellings]

@venetrius please add the relevant labels so we can triage - is this for an alpha or the 8.9 minor for example? 🙏

[venetrius]

@mesellings
This change contains an update to the docs to show that diagram-converter (by the next alpha) is officially supported. Both 8.9 and 8.8 docs are also updated.
It would be great to release this at the same time as the alpha docs but also has changes on already released docs. I am not sure what labels I need to add. Is that alpha enough?
Thanks!

[mesellings]

@mesellings This change contains an update to the docs to show that diagram-converter (by the next alpha) is officially supported. Both 8.9 and 8.8 docs are also updated. It would be great to release this at the same time as the alpha docs but also has changes on already released docs. I am not sure what labels I need to add. Is that alpha enough? Thanks!

Thanks @venetrius I assume you mean alpha-2, not alpha-1? 😊 As the release is on Tuesday, this can probably be merged and released today/tomorrow 👍

[venetrius]

@mesellings This change contains an update to the docs to show that diagram-converter (by the next alpha) is officially supported. Both 8.9 and 8.8 docs are also updated. It would be great to release this at the same time as the alpha docs but also has changes on already released docs. I am not sure what labels I need to add. Is that alpha enough? Thanks!

Thanks @venetrius I assume you mean alpha-2, not alpha-1? 😊 As the release is on Tuesday, this can probably be merged and released today/tomorrow 👍

@mesellings Yes, correct! Thanks!

[HeleneW-dot]

Lgtm!

[HeleneW-dot]

Is the little arrow intended?

[venetrius]

👍 I removed the little arrow

[HeleneW-dot]

Nit: Unsure about capitalisation here

Suggested change

	You can apply recipes individually by phase, or use the **Combined** recipes to run all three phases at once.
	You can apply recipes individually by phase, or use the **combined** recipes to run all three phases at once.

[venetrius]

👍 I updated it in both latest and 8.8

[giorgionaps]

TW edits completed from my side, all corrections committed directly to the branch

[giorgionaps]

Re-approving after deleting emojis

[mesellings]

@venetrius does this need publishing for the alpha-2 release tomorrow?

[venetrius]

@venetrius does this need publishing for the alpha-2 release tomorrow?

Yes, merged it now.

[venetrius]

Thanks for the reviews!