Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: refactor VerifyLeafHashes to compute root separately and then verify it #291

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gupadhyaya
Copy link

@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya commented Mar 18, 2025

Fixes #290

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced data integrity verification with a refined cryptographic proof process and improved error handling.
  • Refactor
    • Streamlined the underlying verification flow to simplify the validation logic and bolster system reliability.
    • Isolated root computation logic into a dedicated method for improved modularity.

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya requested a review from walldiss March 18, 2025 17:21
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 18, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new method, ComputeRoot, within the Proof struct to encapsulate the logic for computing the Merkle tree root from given leaf hashes and proof nodes. The inline root computation previously in VerifyLeafHashes is removed and replaced with a call to ComputeRoot, which now handles recursive traversal and error handling. This refactor modularizes the code and aligns with the objective of exposing the root computation separately.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
proof.go Added a public method ComputeRoot(nth *NmtHasher, leafHashes [][]byte) ([]byte, error) for computing the Merkle tree root using recursive traversal; updated VerifyLeafHashes to call ComputeRoot, removing the previous inline root calculation logic.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant C as Client
    participant V as VerifyLeafHashes
    participant CR as ComputeRoot
    participant R as RecursiveHelper
    C->>V: Call VerifyLeafHashes(proof, data, root)
    V->>CR: ComputeRoot(nth, leafHashes)
    CR->>R: Recursively compute root hash
    R-->>CR: Return computed hash or error
    CR-->>V: Return computed hash/error
    V->>C: Return verification result

Assessment against linked issues

Objective (Issue #) Addressed Explanation
Expose root computation as a separate function (#290)

Poem

I'm a bunny in the code garden, hopping with delight,
New ComputeRoot shines like a carrot in the light,
Old tangled logic is now trimmed and neat,
With recursive hops, the tree's roots meet,
Celebrate the modular magic—hop, skip, and byte! 🐰💻

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c74103 and a5dee5b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • proof.go (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
proof.go (2)

251-325: Well-implemented modular approach to root computation

The new ComputeRoot method is a good example of code modularization. It extracts the root computation logic from VerifyLeafHashes into a separate method, making the code more maintainable and potentially reusable by other parts of the codebase.

The implementation features:

  • Thorough documentation explaining the purpose, parameters, and return values
  • Comprehensive error handling with detailed error messages
  • A clean recursive approach for traversing the Merkle tree structure
  • Proper handling of edge cases (e.g., non-existent subtrees)

415-418: Good refactoring of root verification logic

The replacement of the inline root computation logic with a call to the new ComputeRoot method simplifies the VerifyLeafHashes function and makes the code more maintainable. The error handling is properly preserved.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sorry, something went wrong.

@gupadhyaya gupadhyaya changed the title refactor VerifyLeafHashes to compute root separately and then verify it feat: refactor VerifyLeafHashes to compute root separately and then verify it Mar 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feat: Expose Root Computation from VerifyLeafHashes
1 participant