Skip to content

README: Adds .env file creation instructions#22

Merged
chris-ramon merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chris-ramon-patch-1
Sep 28, 2025
Merged

README: Adds .env file creation instructions#22
chris-ramon merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chris-ramon-patch-1

Conversation

@chris-ramon
Copy link
Owner

@chris-ramon chris-ramon commented Sep 28, 2025

Details

  • README: Adds .env file creation instructions.

Test Plan

✔️ Local manual test.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a “Create .env file” section in Getting Started.
    • Clarifies required environment variables for RSA key configuration.
    • Provides step-by-step commands to base64-encode key contents and copy them to the clipboard for faster setup.
    • Improves onboarding clarity and reduces setup errors.
    • No changes to application behavior.

@chris-ramon chris-ramon self-assigned this Sep 28, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 28, 2025

Walkthrough

Added a “Create .env file” subsection to README under Getting Started, documenting APP_RSA and APP_RSA_PUB variables with example base64-encode-and-copy commands. No code changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Docs update
README.md
Added instructions to create a .env with APP_RSA and APP_RSA_PUB; included sample base64 encoding and clipboard copy commands.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I thump the docs with gentle cheer,
Two keys now whisper, crystal-clear.
Base64 spells in a tidy .env,
Secrets tucked where configs live.
Ears up—ship it, smooth and spry,
A hop, a save, and off we fly! 🐇🔐

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title succinctly and accurately describes the primary change by indicating that the README has been updated to include instructions for creating a .env file, which directly reflects the content added in the changeset.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch chris-ramon-patch-1

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.23%. Comparing base (67928a0) to head (daf27eb).
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #22   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.23%   86.23%           
=======================================
  Files           4        4           
  Lines         109      109           
=======================================
  Hits           94       94           
  Misses         12       12           
  Partials        3        3           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 86.23% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 67928a0 and daf27eb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md

16-16: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)


21-21: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

Comment on lines +17 to +23
cat app.rsa | base64 | tr -d '\n'|pbcopy
```

`APP_RSA_PUB`
```
cat app.rsa.pub | base64 | tr -d '\n'|pbcopy
```
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Sep 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Fix markdownlint MD040 by annotating the shell snippets.

markdownlint-cli2 flags these fenced blocks because they omit a language hint, which will break the docs lint step. Please mark them as shell/Bash commands.

-```
-cat app.rsa | base64 | tr -d '\n'|pbcopy
-```
+```bash
+cat app.rsa | base64 | tr -d '\n' | pbcopy
+```
@@
-```
-cat app.rsa.pub | base64 | tr -d '\n'|pbcopy
-```
+```bash
+cat app.rsa.pub | base64 | tr -d '\n' | pbcopy
+```
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

21-21: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around lines 17 to 23, the fenced code blocks are missing a
language hint which triggers markdownlint MD040; update both fenced blocks to
use a shell/Bash language tag (e.g., ```bash) and normalize spacing around the
pipes so the commands read "cat app.rsa | base64 | tr -d '\n' | pbcopy" and "cat
app.rsa.pub | base64 | tr -d '\n' | pbcopy", closing each block with ``` after
the command.

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call @coderabbitai, let's keep it as-is for this PR for consistency with existing bash code snippets.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for other fenced code blocks in the README to verify consistency claim
echo "=== All fenced code blocks in README.md ==="
grep -n -A 5 -B 1 '```' README.md

echo -e "\n=== Counting fenced blocks with and without language hints ==="
echo "Blocks with language hints:"
grep -c '```[a-zA-Z]' README.md

echo "Blocks without language hints (just ```):"
grep -c '^```$' README.md

Length of output: 690


@chris-ramon, you're absolutely right! I can see that all the existing bash code snippets in the README use plain ``` without language hints, so maintaining that consistency makes perfect sense for this project. Thanks for keeping the formatting uniform across the documentation.


✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: chris-ramon
PR: chris-ramon/golang-scaffolding#22
File: README.md:17-23
Timestamp: 2025-09-28T19:13:50.099Z
Learning: In the golang-scaffolding project README.md, all bash code snippets use plain ``` fenced code blocks without language hints for consistency, even though this triggers markdownlint MD040 warnings.

Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.

Copy link
Owner Author

@chris-ramon chris-ramon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍 🚢

@chris-ramon chris-ramon merged commit 36df265 into main Sep 28, 2025
2 checks passed
@chris-ramon chris-ramon deleted the chris-ramon-patch-1 branch September 28, 2025 19:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants