Conversation
WalkthroughAdded a "DB Migrations" section to README.md explaining how to open a DB container and run Up/Down migrations with the migrate tool using a Postgres DSN and the project's migrations path. No code or API changes. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #25 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 86.23% 86.23%
=======================================
Files 4 4
Lines 109 109
=======================================
Hits 94 94
Misses 12 12
Partials 3 3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| ##### DB Migrations | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| docker exec -it golang-scaffolding-app-1 bash | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| Up | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| migrate -database "postgres://admin:admin@db:5432/local?sslmode=disable" -path "./db/migrations" up 1 | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| Down | ||
|
|
||
| ```bash | ||
| migrate -database "postgres://admin:admin@db:5432/local?sslmode=disable" -path "./db/migrations" down 1 | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarify migrate step count.
migrate ... up 1 only applies a single pending migration. People following this to bootstrap a fresh DB will stop after the very first migration and end up with an incomplete schema. Swap it to up (to run all pending migrations) and, if you keep the step form, make the distinction explicit so readers know when to use each.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around lines 35–51, the migration examples use "up 1" which only
applies a single migration and will leave a fresh DB incomplete; change the
example to use "up" to apply all pending migrations, and update the Down example
similarly (or note that "down" reverts all pending/available migrations), and
add a short sentence explaining the difference between the step form (e.g., "up
N"/"down N" applies N migrations) and the no-step form (runs all pending
migrations) so readers know when to use each.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@coderabbitai neat call! — Addressed it via: 3193ea0.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the commit 3193ea0 to verify the fix
git show 3193ea0 --stat
echo "---"
git show 3193ea0 -- README.md
Length of output: 929
@chris-ramon Thanks for the update! The clarification that these commands run "one migration" is definitely an improvement and makes the step-by-step nature more explicit.
Just to note: someone setting up a fresh database would still need to run the "up 1" command multiple times (once for each migration file) to get the complete schema. If that's the intended workflow for your project, then this documentation works well. Alternatively, you could add a note about using up (without the number) to apply all pending migrations at once for initial setup, and keep the "up 1"/"down 1" examples for incremental changes during development.
Either way, it's your call on what workflow best fits your project! 👍
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit