main - Update the main branch for sdl3 recipe

[ymontmarin]

Checklist

• Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
• Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
• Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
• Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
• Ensured the license file is being packaged.

[ymontmarin]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[ymontmarin]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you, but it looks like there was nothing to do.

_{This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/13309355327. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.}

[ymontmarin]

To merge after output validation via token --> see discussion in conda-forge/staged-recipes#29061

[traversaro]

@ManifoldFR @matham @dschreij can you confirm you are ok in being added as maintainers here?

[ManifoldFR]

Yes, I confirm I agree to be a maintainer

[ymontmarin]

@ManifoldFR @matham @dschreij can you confirm you are ok in being added as maintainers here?

From what @h-vetinari said in conda-forge/sdl2-feedstock#60, @dschreij looks inactive on github, but I put them as maintainer as they were on sdl2-feedstock and I did pull the history from there. But If we are enough maintainers, I can remove them.

[traversaro]

@ManifoldFR @matham @dschreij can you confirm you are ok in being added as maintainers here?

From what @h-vetinari said in conda-forge/sdl2-feedstock#60, @dschreij looks inactive on github, but I put them as maintainer as they were on sdl2-feedstock and I did pull the history from there. But If we are enough maintainers, I can remove them.

I would just add active maintainers that actively specified they want to be maintainer. If a former mantainer of sdl2 wants to be added here, he/she just need to ask.

[ymontmarin]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[ymontmarin]

@traversaro is it ok for you if I merge ? (this one and the v2 one)

[ymontmarin]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[traversaro]

CI on linux-aarch64 aand linux-ppc64le is taking forever, can't we use cross-compilation there?

[traversaro]

@conda-forge-admin please rerender

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

Commits were made to this PR after the automerge label was added. For security reasons, I have disabled automerge by removing the automerge label. Please add the automerge label again (or ask a maintainer to do so) if you'd like to enable automerge again!

[ymontmarin]

Thank you for the cross-compilation.
Should we add the abi branches v2 and v1.2 for the bot in conda_forge.yml in this PR or in a following one ?
Sorry for the too early merge of the v2 branch.

[traversaro]

Should we add the abi branches v2 and v1.2 for the bot in conda_forge.yml in this PR or in a following one ?

Let's add them here, thanks!

Sorry for the too early merge of the v2 branch.

No problem!

[ymontmarin]

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

[conda-forge-admin]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you, but it looks like there was nothing to do.

_{This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/13332845445. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail.}

[traversaro]

Thanks @ymontmarin !

[ymontmarin]

Thanks for the merge @traversaro !

It looks like the CI is not launching when merge in the conda-forge/feedstock ?

[traversaro]

It looks like the CI is not launching when merge in the conda-forge/feedstock ?

I triggered a build in 0c88c68 .

[ymontmarin]

Thank you !
Could you do the same for the v2 branch ?