-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
Fix sqlite3 "database is locked" in pipelined shards cache #926
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+83
−1
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ | ||
| ### Enhancements | ||
|
|
||
| * <news item> | ||
|
|
||
| ### Bug fixes | ||
|
|
||
| * Open the sharded repodata cache (`repodata_shards.db`) in WAL mode with a | ||
| longer SQLite busy timeout, so the pipelined cache reader thread no longer | ||
| races with the network writer thread and raises | ||
| `sqlite3.OperationalError: database is locked`. Fall back to the default | ||
| journal mode on filesystems where WAL is not supported. (#924) | ||
|
|
||
| ### Deprecations | ||
|
|
||
| * <news item> | ||
|
|
||
| ### Docs | ||
|
|
||
| * <news item> | ||
|
|
||
| ### Other | ||
|
|
||
| * <news item> |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm a big fan of WAL mode. It could fail not because of filesystem locks, which are used by all sqlite3 modes, but because shared memory is not available (if conda's cache is on a shared filesystem, accessed by two computers). conda-index users requested we drop WAL mode for this reason.
On the other hand, this is only a cache; and there are lots of reasons why conda might not work if two conda's try to use the same cache concurrently.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I notice that we turn foreign_keys = ON but we only have one table and no foreign keys. Probably good practice anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that's fine, I think. I remembered that PR. I think in this case we need it.