Skip to content

Conversation

emasab
Copy link
Contributor

@emasab emasab commented Jun 3, 2025

with same API as the sync ones

What

Checklist

  • Contains customer facing changes? Including API/behavior changes
  • Did you add sufficient unit test and/or integration test coverage for this PR?
    • If not, please explain why it is not required

References

JIRA:

Test & Review

Open questions / Follow-ups

@confluent-cla-assistant
Copy link

🎉 All Contributor License Agreements have been signed. Ready to merge.
Please push an empty commit if you would like to re-run the checks to verify CLA status for all contributors.

@airlock-confluentinc airlock-confluentinc bot force-pushed the dev_asyncio_producer_consumer branch from ca786bb to 25f2a68 Compare June 3, 2025 13:21
@sonarqube-confluent

This comment has been minimized.

1 similar comment
@sonarqube-confluent

This comment has been minimized.

with same API as the sync ones
@airlock-confluentinc airlock-confluentinc bot force-pushed the dev_asyncio_producer_consumer branch from 25f2a68 to 56e37d4 Compare June 3, 2025 14:19
@sonarqube-confluent
Copy link

Failed

  • 0.00% Coverage on New Code (is less than 80.00%)

Analysis Details

0 Issues

  • Bug 0 Bugs
  • Vulnerability 0 Vulnerabilities
  • Code Smell 0 Code Smells

Coverage and Duplications

  • Coverage 0.00% Coverage (59.90% Estimated after merge)
  • Duplications No duplication information (6.10% Estimated after merge)

Project ID: confluent-kafka-python

View in SonarQube

@MSeal
Copy link
Contributor

MSeal commented Aug 26, 2025

Closing as we're developing this within the async branch

@MSeal MSeal closed this Aug 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants