Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 8, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
reflect-metadata (source) ^0.1.12^0.2.0 age confidence

Release Notes

rbuckton/reflect-metadata (reflect-metadata)

v0.2.2

Compare Source

v0.2.1

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: microsoft/reflect-metadata@v0.2.0...v0.2.1

v0.2.0: reflect-metadata 0.2.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

Full Changelog: microsoft/reflect-metadata@v0.1.14...v0.2.0

v0.1.14: reflect-metadata 0.1.14

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: microsoft/reflect-metadata@v0.1.13...v0.1.14


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated a core dependency to the latest compatible version.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@renovate renovate bot added the renovate label Jan 8, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The reflect-metadata dependency version is bumped from ^0.1.12 to ^0.2.0 in package.json. This is a single-line update to the dependencies object with no other changes to packages, scripts, configuration, or code.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed Title accurately describes the main change: updating reflect-metadata dependency from ^0.1.12 to ^0.2.0 in package.json.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8a85f7f and c3d8589.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
package.json (1)

2667-2667: Dependency bump is safe; inversify compatibility already ensured by existing code structure.

The codebase correctly imports reflect-metadata once at startup via a dedicated wrapper module before any inversify references, which handles the 0.2.x loading requirements. The resolved version 0.2.2 includes a stack overflow bugfix. No changes needed.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 0%. Comparing base (3f44449) to head (c3d8589).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@     Coverage Diff     @@
##   main   #284   +/-   ##
===========================
===========================
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/reflect-metadata-0.x branch from f2a5b51 to 8a85f7f Compare January 9, 2026 13:50
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/reflect-metadata-0.x branch from 8a85f7f to c3d8589 Compare January 12, 2026 08:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant