Prefer "schema" syntax for examples

[gregziegan]

Our dhall-kubernetes usage has preferred the Schema::{} syntax. Aligning the public documentation with schema usage would be great for on-boarding!

(Just realized the auto-formatter defaulted to unicode characters, would maintainers rather keep ascii?)

[gregziegan]

hmm not sure why the hydra check is hanging. I also tried running ./scripts/generate.sh but the nix build failed with

Setup: Encountered missing dependencies:
QuickCheck >=2.7 && <2.13

[Gabriella439]

@thebritican: I just pushed some changes which should fix the CI failures and upgrade dhall to version 1.27.0

[ari-becker]

Can we get a new release cut for dhall-kubernetes now that the Schema::{} syntax is the recommended means of using the repo?

[Gabriella439]

@ari-becker: I'm not sure what the release process is for dhall-kubernetes is. Is it just a matter of creating a tag and a GitHub release?

[ari-becker]

@Gabriel439 yup, pretty sure that's it. Internally we're pinning to specific commits by importing https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhall-lang/dhall-kubernetes/7af2ab5345fbd09e02437b3a6ce8f10d9e941f4c/schemas.dhall but obviously that's not as semantically meaningful as pinning to a version.

Ping @f-f who released 1.0.0

Related to #57

[Gabriella439]

@ari-becker: Alright, I just created a release: https://github.com/dhall-lang/dhall-kubernetes/releases/tag/v2.0.0

[f-f]

Sorry for delay; yes, a release is just a matter of creating a GitHub release here.

Thanks @Gabriel439 🙂

[Gabriella439]

@f-f: You're welcome! 🙂