-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 214
Add accessor for included pty instance #1109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
7482fa4
to
8fa4a3e
Compare
The cleancheck fails with
but I can't see how this relates to my commit... |
Test Results 602 files - 34 602 suites - 34 13m 18s ⏱️ - 23m 12s Results for commit 15be3b0. ± Comparison against base commit 04105c2. This pull request removes 1217 tests.
♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
@jonahgraham @akurtakov any chance to push this forward? |
41e3ea7
to
53360da
Compare
It seems the cleanup is modify the |
1c747f8
to
36f56c8
Compare
Looks like it was actually the Year that needs to be changed here... |
Currently if I get passed a Process from by a method call I can check it for the Spawner and can already call special methods like hangup(). But there is no way to get access the the PTY used to create the Spawner so for example one can't call PTY#setTerminalSize or query any other properties. This now adds a new method pty() that returns this instance for further investigation and actions.
36f56c8
to
15be3b0
Compare
Build is finally green! |
+1 |
Currently if I get passed a Process from by a method call I can check it for the Spawner and can already call special methods like hangup(). But there is no way to get access the the PTY used to create the Spawner so for example one can't call PTY#setTerminalSize or query any other properties.
This now adds a new method pty() that returns this instance for further investigation and actions.
See