Skip to content

build: migrate eslint.config.js to typescript #531

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

michaelfaith
Copy link
Contributor

This change migrates the eslint config for the repo to typescript. This is in support of the larger migration to typescript. In order for us to continue to consume the plugin locally, after it's been converted to typescript (without having to build first), we'll need to be loading the config from typescript.

Since I needed to update eslint to support, I took the opportunity to all of the other plugins too (except unicorn).

I also removed a rule disable that had a note on it about dropping after we dropped support for node 14.

This change migrates the eslint config for the repo to typescript.  This is in support of the larger migration to typescript.  In order for us to continue to consume the plugin locally, after it's been converted to typescript (without having to build first), we'll need to be loading the config from typescript.

Since I needed to update eslint to support, I took the opportunity to all of the other plugins too (except unicorn).

I also removed a rule disable that had a note on it about dropping after we dropped support for node 14.
@michaelfaith michaelfaith marked this pull request as ready for review July 19, 2025 01:34
@michaelfaith michaelfaith requested a review from bmish July 19, 2025 20:51
@bmish bmish merged commit f8775e4 into eslint-community:main Jul 19, 2025
5 checks passed
@michaelfaith michaelfaith deleted the build/switch-eslint-config-to-ts branch July 19, 2025 21:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants