[2025-02-22] Bump dependency updates identified by dependabot

[henrybear327]

Please read https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#contribution-flow.

This pull request completes this week's etcd dependency updates following our dependency roster and dependency management instructions.

Summary of actions

Bumped

• build(deps): bump honnef.co/go/tools from 0.5.1 to 0.6.0 in /tools/mod #19434
• build(deps): bump github.com/golangci/golangci-lint from 1.63.4 to 1.64.5 in /tools/mod #19435
• build(deps): bump github.com/alexfalkowski/gocovmerge from 1.3.18 to 1.4.0 in /tools/mod #19436
• build(deps): bump golang.org/x/net from 0.34.0 to 0.35.0 #19437
• build(deps): bump github.com/spf13/cobra from 1.8.1 to 1.9.1 #19438

Fully indirect

• N/A

Please read https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#contribution-flow.

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: henrybear327
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign spzala for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[henrybear327]

@henrybear327: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-etcd-verify 5f1816e link true /test pull-etcd-verify
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

@ivanvc there are quite some linter errors after bumping the dependency this time. Should I address all of them also in this PR?

[ivanvc]

@ivanvc there are quite some linter errors after bumping the dependency this time. Should I address all of them also in this PR?

I reviewed them, and addressing them sounds easy. However, it's going to be a lengthier pull request. I think we should do that in a new pull request first, then rebase this pull request after we merge.

[ahrtr]

Please fix the workflow failures. thx

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.92%. Comparing base (2de17bd) to head (916d0dd).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

see 21 files with indirect coverage changes

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #19466      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.84%   68.92%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         420      420              
  Lines       35762    35762              
==========================================
+ Hits        24622    24648      +26     
+ Misses       9714     9692      -22     
+ Partials     1426     1422       -4     

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 022b9b2...916d0dd. Read the comment docs.

[henrybear327]

Rebased this PR on #19475 to resolve CI issues

cc: @ahrtr @ivanvc