pydantic example formatting: Use generic nodes rather than raw html#52
Merged
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
t20100
force-pushed
the
generic-examples-code
branch
from
737658b to
3f26c4d
Compare
loichuder
approved these changes
Jun 4, 2026
t20100
force-pushed
the
generic-examples-code
branch
from
5b18d96 to
01cddf3
Compare
Member
Author
|
Almost back to what it was with css tweaks: 
|
Member
Author
|
added examples in the output: 
|
t20100
force-pushed
the
generic-examples-code
branch
from
c0d4929 to
104ffa4
Compare
loichuder
approved these changes
Jun 4, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR makes use of
literalandliteral_blockrather thanrawto render pydantic examples.This leads to a poorer display but supports all formats.
Follow-up of #51 (comment)