-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21.5k
fix: prevent crash when BigInt passed to res.status() #6848
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -64,11 +64,11 @@ module.exports = res | |
| res.status = function status(code) { | ||
| // Check if the status code is not an integer | ||
| if (!Number.isInteger(code)) { | ||
| throw new TypeError(`Invalid status code: ${JSON.stringify(code)}. Status code must be an integer.`); | ||
| throw new TypeError(`Invalid status code: ${String(code)} (${typeof code}). Status code must be an integer.`); | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. As @abhisekp pointed out in #6848 (comment), this will print objects as |
||
| } | ||
| // Check if the status code is outside of Node's valid range | ||
| if (code < 100 || code > 999) { | ||
| throw new RangeError(`Invalid status code: ${JSON.stringify(code)}. Status code must be greater than 99 and less than 1000.`); | ||
| throw new RangeError(`Invalid status code: ${String(code)} (${typeof code}). Status code must be greater than 99 and less than 1000.`); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| this.statusCode = code; | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What if the
codeis an object?String(code)will give[Object object]There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Likely, they wanted to show what the user has passed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You raise a valid point about object serialization. However, I believe the current approach with String(code) is the right solution for the following reasons:
Crash Prevention: The primary goal is to prevent server crashes. JSON.stringify() causes an uncaught TypeError with BigInt, which crashes the entire server. This is a critical issue that needs to be fixed.
Type Information: The error message format ${String(code)} (${typeof code}) actually provides more useful debugging information than JSON.stringify() in many cases:
For BigInt: "200 (bigint)" vs crash
For objects: "[object Object] (object)" vs "{"a":1}"
For functions: "function(){} (function)" vs "{}"
For arrays: "1,2,3 (object)" vs "[1,2,3]"
Practical Usage: Status codes are typically integers, strings, or occasionally undefined/null. Objects and functions as status codes are extremely rare edge cases that indicate programming errors rather than legitimate use cases.
Consistency: Using String() provides consistent behavior across all JavaScript types without special handling.
If we wanted to show more object details, we could use a try-catch approach:
But this adds complexity for a rare edge case. The current solution prioritizes crash prevention and provides sufficient debugging information for the vast majority of real-world scenarios.
What do you think? Should we stick with the simple String(code) approach, or would you prefer the try-catch solution for better object serialization?