Pydantic 'alias' bug #1379
Open
Pydantic 'alias' bug #1379
+5
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This workaround fixes Pydantic serialization/deserialization while not modifying the internal alias logic. I cannot figure out why alias is not being passed through anymore. For example, I was needing to add schema_extra with these key values in order to read data from a Json with different field names. Thank you for your consideration.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
bug
/This workaround fixes Pydantic serialization/deserialization while not modifying the internal alias logic. I cannot figure out why alias is not being passed through anymore.
For example, I was needing to add schema_extra with these key values in order to read/write data from a Json
https://docs.pydantic.dev/latest/concepts/fields/#field-aliases
#290
Thank you for your consideration.