Skip to content

[ruby] New version of rubocop-rspec (3.6.0) produced dependency conflicts #24

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[ruby] New version of rubocop-rspec (3.6.0) produced dependency conflicts #24

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

depfu[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Apr 19, 2025

We've tried to upgrade a dependency and got errors running Bundler. It looks like there is a version conflict between two or more dependencies. Depfu doesn't try to solve these, as this would mean to update more than one dependency at a time.

Please take a look at the exact failure to figure out if this is something you need to work on.

The bundler error message was:

Bundler could not find compatible versions for gem "rubocop":
  In Gemfile:
    rubocop (~> 1.61.0)

    rubocop-rspec (~> 3.6.0) was resolved to 3.6.0, which depends on
      rubocop (>= 1.72.1, ~> 1.72)

What changed?

✳️ rubocop-rspec (~> 2.27.0 → ~> 3.6.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

3.6.0

  • Fix false positive in RSpec/Pending, where it would mark the default block it as an offense. (@bquorning)
  • Fix issue when Style/ContextWording is configured with a Prefix being interpreted as a boolean, like on. (@sakuro)
  • Add new RSpec/IncludeExamples cop to enforce using it_behaves_like over include_examples. (@dvandersluis)
  • Change RSpec/ScatteredSetup to allow around hooks to be scattered. (@ydah)
  • Fix an error RSpec/ChangeByZero cop when without expect block. (@lee266)
  • Fix a false positive for RSpec/DescribedClass when SkipBlocks is true and numblocks are used. (@earlopain)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 36 commits:

Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Apr 19, 2025
@depfu depfu bot mentioned this pull request Apr 19, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
depfu
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
0 participants