Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug/string agg limit #133
Bug/string agg limit #133
Changes from 14 commits
f4dc4db
86dc929
196dbb6
88400a9
cf7d12a
c9fe823
655c552
6ec7632
5097e52
1f12065
a3c5468
e654e99
d26b848
27c9c11
a49fa75
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Small note, but I noticed the end model results in no conversation or count_comments because of this join. It seems that since we don't have any
author_user_id
oruser_id
combinations within the seed data the inner join always results in no records.Would you be able to update the seed data to have at least one match so we can verify results in the future.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had updated the seed data to match one, and I'm showing the counts are showing up. Were you using the seed data from my branch?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Very interesting 🤔 thanks for showing the results! It must have been a mismatch on my end with using old seed data in place of your updates. This is all good to me!
Large diffs are not rendered by default.