-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding workaround for the case when a connect gets stuck forever #1
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
For a green build #2 needs to be merged first. |
Merged your other PR - if you could fix the conflict here I'll take a look. |
// It turns out that under certain unknown circumstances the connect waits forever: https://github.com/twitter/cloudhopper-smpp/issues/117 | ||
// That's why the future is canceled 1 second after the specified timeout. | ||
// This is a workaround and hopefully not needed after the switch to netty 4. | ||
if (!connectFuture.await(connectTimeoutMillis + 1000)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I originally used two minutes just to be on the safe side, but I think 1 second should do the trick. I don't want to use the same time as the real timeout in order not to interfere with the real timeout.
I fixed the conflict long time ago, but I forgot to comment again. Fixed ;) |
… awaitUninterruptibly() as per fizzed#1
Fixed issue with connection being stuck on awaitUninterruptibly() as per fizzed#1 Fixed blocking issue at channel write. Related issue RestComm/smpp-extensions#28
…per fizzed#1 Fixed blocking issue at channel write. Related issue RestComm/smpp-extensions#28
I hope to fix twitter-archive#117 with this pull request.
I was never able to reproduce the issue in our test environment. In the end I put my change on some of the production servers and I could verify via behavior and logging that it actually fixed my problem.
This is a workaround and I guess the problem is somewhere inside netty. But since there is already a branch to move to netty 4, I don't think it is worth to track down the bug there.
PS: Currently bugs can not be reported to this project.