out_splunk: do not fail on Opentelemetry packing if some Log fields are missing (backport v3.2) #10154
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…re missing If the OpenTelemetry Log fields like host.name, severity_text or severity are not found in the original record, the packing was reporting an error. This PR just remove the exception since it's ok not to have that information as part of the log record. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Silva <[email protected]>
edsiper
requested review from
leonardo-albertovich,
fujimotos and
koleini
as code owners
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
backport of: #10153
If the OpenTelemetry Log fields like host.name, severity_text or severity are not found in the original record, the packing was reporting an error.
This PR just remove the exception since it's ok not to have that information as part of the log record.
Fluent Bit is licensed under Apache 2.0, by submitting this pull request I understand that this code will be released under the terms of that license.