deb: prepare to coexist with flux-core package #7
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Problem: when there is a new tag, the autom4te.cache directory must be manually removed for it to be picked up by configure. Add the autoreconf --force flag where it is called from autogen.sh. Also, instead of echoing each command, just set -v in the shebang.
Problem: flux-foundry is spilt off from flux-core, so will conflict with versions that predate the split. Add appropriate package metadata per https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#syntax-of-relationship-fields Fixes flux-framework#5
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
deb: prepare to coexist with flux-core package
Problem: flux-foundry is spilt off from flux-core, so will conflict with versions that predate the split.
Add appropriate package metadata per
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#syntax-of-relationship-fields
Fixes #5