docs: fix bifunctor bimap Result example #646
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The original example `let resOk11 = bimap ((+) 1) string (Ok 10)` implied that the first function would be applied to the Result when it is `Ok` (returning OK 11). However, this is backwards to the actual implementation: ```fsharp let resOk11 = bimap ((+) 1) string (Ok 10) // val resOk11: Result<string,int> = Ok "10" ``` I have switched the order of the functions so that it produces the result expected (based on the name of the value binding `resOk11`): ```fsharp let resOk11 = bimap string ((+) 1) (Ok 10) // val resOk11: Result<int,string> = Ok 11 ```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The original example
let resOk11 = bimap ((+) 1) string (Ok 10)implied that the first function would be applied to the Result when it isOk(returningOk 11). However, this is backwards to the actual implementation:I have switched the order of the functions so that it produces the result expected (based on the name of the value binding
resOk11):