-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 454
Add E2E tests for Logback #4599
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ | |||
package io.sentry.systemtest.io.sentry.systemtest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bug: Duplicate Package Declaration Causes Compilation Issues
The package declaration package io.sentry.systemtest.io.sentry.systemtest
contains a duplicated segment. It should be package io.sentry.systemtest
to match the file path, as the current declaration will cause compilation errors or incorrect package structure.
Performance metrics 🚀
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM aside for the nit reported by Cursor
kotlinOptions.jvmTarget = JavaVersion.VERSION_17.toString() | ||
} | ||
|
||
tasks.withType<KotlinCompile>().configureEach { | ||
kotlinOptions { | ||
freeCompilerArgs = listOf("-Xjsr305=strict") | ||
jvmTarget = JavaVersion.VERSION_17.toString() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a reason to set the jvmTarget
twice on the kotlinOptions
, or are the configurations redundant?
The question applies to the other E2E PRs as well.
#skip-changelog
📜 Description
💡 Motivation and Context
💚 How did you test it?
📝 Checklist
sendDefaultPII
is enabled.🔮 Next steps