Skip to content

Add E2E tests for Logback #4599

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

adinauer
Copy link
Member

@adinauer adinauer commented Aug 4, 2025

#skip-changelog

📜 Description

💡 Motivation and Context

💚 How did you test it?

📝 Checklist

  • I added tests to verify the changes.
  • No new PII added or SDK only sends newly added PII if sendDefaultPII is enabled.
  • I updated the docs if needed.
  • I updated the wizard if needed.
  • Review from the native team if needed.
  • No breaking change or entry added to the changelog.
  • No breaking change for hybrid SDKs or communicated to hybrid SDKs.

🔮 Next steps

@adinauer adinauer marked this pull request as ready for review August 4, 2025 11:28
Copy link
Member Author

adinauer commented Aug 4, 2025

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
package io.sentry.systemtest.io.sentry.systemtest
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: Duplicate Package Declaration Causes Compilation Issues

The package declaration package io.sentry.systemtest.io.sentry.systemtest contains a duplicated segment. It should be package io.sentry.systemtest to match the file path, as the current declaration will cause compilation errors or incorrect package structure.

Fix in Cursor Fix in Web

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2025

Performance metrics 🚀

  Plain With Sentry Diff
Startup time 410.06 ms 431.64 ms 21.58 ms
Size 1.58 MiB 2.09 MiB 521.57 KiB

Copy link
Member

@lcian lcian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM aside for the nit reported by Cursor

Comment on lines +25 to +31
kotlinOptions.jvmTarget = JavaVersion.VERSION_17.toString()
}

tasks.withType<KotlinCompile>().configureEach {
kotlinOptions {
freeCompilerArgs = listOf("-Xjsr305=strict")
jvmTarget = JavaVersion.VERSION_17.toString()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason to set the jvmTarget twice on the kotlinOptions, or are the configurations redundant?

The question applies to the other E2E PRs as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants