Skip to content

Conversation

abhishek818
Copy link

@abhishek818 abhishek818 commented Oct 14, 2024

closes #32257
/claim #32257

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Oct 14, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code label Oct 14, 2024
@abhishek818 abhishek818 force-pushed the comment_on_non_diff_lines branch from 350613c to a65f0f6 Compare October 14, 2024 18:40
@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Oct 14, 2024

Once a user comments in the non-diff lines, it should be displayed in the changed files. So we need to automatically expand those lines that have non-diff comments. Or we can have a indicate icon there are comments hidden in non-diff code lines.

@yp05327
Copy link
Contributor

yp05327 commented Oct 15, 2024

IIRC, GitHub can only comment on those no displayed lines at first. I think this is for the concern mentioned above. So simply change the condition is not right I think.
e.g.
image
image

@abhishek818 abhishek818 marked this pull request as draft October 18, 2024 05:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🙋 Bounty claim lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Commenting unchanged lines
5 participants