Skip to content

Conversation

confusedsushi
Copy link
Contributor

When sorting issues and pull requests by the nearest due date, the issues and PRs without a due date are currently sorted descending by their creation date. This seems counter intuitive to me. When sorting by nearest due date I want to see the issues/PRs in the order they should be worked on. For issues/PRs without a due date that order should be first come first served rather than last come first served.

This PR now changes the ordering of issues/PRs which don't have a due date to ascending by their creation date. So that the oldest is shown first and the newest last.

This now also makes the sort order nearest due date a true opposite to farthest due date. At farthest due date the newest is shown first and the oldest last.


Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Aug 13, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code label Aug 13, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Aug 14, 2025
@lunny lunny added this to the 1.25.0 milestone Aug 14, 2025
@lunny lunny added the type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality label Aug 14, 2025
@6543 6543 requested a review from delvh August 18, 2025 10:57
@6543
Copy link
Member

6543 commented Aug 18, 2025

I could have a conflict of interest reviewing this - might you wana review it instead ? - thx :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code type/enhancement An improvement of existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants