openexr: CC individual maintainers instead of [email protected] #14205
+1
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
[email protected] is moderated so the message require individual approval before they're delivered, which is problematic if the moderator (me) is inaccessible. Better to list the 3 primary maintainers directly. Signed-off-by: Cary Phillips <[email protected]>
|
cary-ilm is either the primary contact or is in the CCs list of projects/openexr. |
Contributor
Author
|
And while I have your attention... is there a way to add individuals to an individual issue? I don't see a place in the oss-fuzz issue page to add to the CC list, am I missing it? |
Contributor
Author
|
Can I kindly nudge this along? I'm trying to limit the email traffic we're seeing. Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On second thought, [email protected] is moderated so the message require individual approval before they're delivered, which is problematic if the moderator (me) is inaccessible. Better to list the 3 primary maintainers directly.