Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added a new example using Falcon and graphene-sqlalchemy #166

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

somada141
Copy link
Contributor

Some time ago I put together an example utilising Falcon and graphene-sqlalchemy. It can be found under https://github.com/somada141/demo-graphql-sqlalchemy-falcon.

The example demonstrates setting up the SQLAlchemy ORM schema, representing it in GraphQL through graphene-sqlalchemy, and performing queries and mutations.

It also demonstrates how to use the GraphQL AST to limit the SQLAlchemy queries to only the fields requested in the GraphQL query.

@somada141
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just realised the build fails cause its trying to run the tests out of my example, will fix

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 91.854% when pulling f850b81 on somada141:feature/falcon-example into 33d5b74 on graphql-python:master.

3 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 91.854% when pulling f850b81 on somada141:feature/falcon-example into 33d5b74 on graphql-python:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 91.854% when pulling f850b81 on somada141:feature/falcon-example into 33d5b74 on graphql-python:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 91.854% when pulling f850b81 on somada141:feature/falcon-example into 33d5b74 on graphql-python:master.

@FabriceSalvaire
Copy link

Thanks to share ! It's an interesting use case.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants