Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate and Fix Incorrect Event Check-In Times in VRMS #1872

Open
7 tasks
JackHaeg opened this issue Mar 18, 2025 · 2 comments
Open
7 tasks

Investigate and Fix Incorrect Event Check-In Times in VRMS #1872

JackHaeg opened this issue Mar 18, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@JackHaeg
Copy link
Member

JackHaeg commented Mar 18, 2025

Overview

Event check-ins in VRMS are being displayed at incorrect times, potentially due to an issue in the event processing flow. A comprehensive review of the entire check-in flow is needed to identify the root cause and implement a permanent fix.

Action Items

  • Conduct a full review of the event check-in process to determine where the issue originates.
  • Investigate whether another worker process is contributing to the incorrect timestamps.
  • Document findings and outline necessary changes to resolve the issue.
  • Refactor portions of the create recurring events structure into smaller functions where possible, making them more easily testable via unit tests.
  • Implement the fix based on findings and refactored code.
  • Test the solution thoroughly, ensuring event check-ins display the correct times.
  • Validate across different scenarios to confirm stability.

Resources/Instructions

  • Review existing VRMS event processing and worker logic.
  • Check relevant logs for inconsistencies in check-in timestamps.
  • Reference internal documentation related to event handling and worker processes.
  • This issue is part of the epic Epic: Check in bug tracker and resolution #1838
@JackHaeg
Copy link
Member Author

JackHaeg commented Mar 18, 2025

@kurtmgray here is the new issue I created to track your work on researching / fixing the check in timing bug. Please feel free to revise this issue however makes sense to you. Note that these are mostly stand in action items for the moment based on what I thought could serve as potential next steps.

@JackHaeg
Copy link
Member Author

@kurtmgray will be leaving the team due to a new position. Un-assigning this issue and placing back in the prioritized backlog.

@JackHaeg JackHaeg moved this from In progress to Prioritized Backlog in P: VRMS: Project Board Mar 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Prioritized Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants