-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 416
9.14 support #4780
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
9.14 support #4780
Conversation
wz1000
commented
Jan 1, 2026
- wip: Build ghcide with 9.14
- plugins build with 9.14
43a20ad to
0deb1d2
Compare
| description: "Cabal version" | ||
| required: false | ||
| default: "3.14.2.0" | ||
| default: "3.16.0.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be bumped to 3.16.1.0
|
FYI Building HLS 2.12.0.0 using GHC 9.12.3 fails, too:
Will this PR also fix this? |
|
@benz0li I don't think so, the failed CI jobs point to |
|
According to https://discourse.haskell.org/t/critical-code-generation-bug-with-ghc-9-12-3/13505 we should avoid using GHC 9.12.3 altogether. (Maybe irrelevant). |
True. Then, I wonder why it picks |
|
@benz0li Ah, perhaps the index-state needs to be updated? That might be fixed by this PR. |
Cross reference: |
fendor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, the Compile.hs module could probably need a rework, and there are plenty of ad-hoc CPP statements... But we should get to that later, it is more important to get a release out.