chore: bump ethers-rs dependencies to 2025-05-02 tag#6118
Merged
ameten merged 1 commit intoMay 6, 2025
Conversation
|
ameten
reviewed
May 5, 2025
ameten
approved these changes
May 6, 2025
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6118 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 76.92% 76.92%
=======================================
Files 109 109
Lines 2158 2158
Branches 195 195
=======================================
Hits 1660 1660
Misses 477 477
Partials 21 21
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This is a bump of the
ethers-rsdeps to the latest tagged version.See:
elliptic,k256andyubicrates to latest ethers-rs#40 for a description of these changesDrive-by changes
n/a
Related issues
n/a
Backward compatibility
Yes
Testing
Manual testing via using #5625