Skip to content

BUD-10: Blob search#78

Open
kehiy wants to merge 1 commit intohzrd149:masterfrom
kehiy:master
Open

BUD-10: Blob search#78
kehiy wants to merge 1 commit intohzrd149:masterfrom
kehiy:master

Conversation

@kehiy
Copy link
Contributor

@kehiy kehiy commented Jul 30, 2025

No description provided.

@kehiy
Copy link
Contributor Author

kehiy commented Jul 30, 2025

@hzrd149

@kehiy kehiy mentioned this pull request Jul 30, 2025
@hzrd149 hzrd149 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 30, 2025
@hzrd149
Copy link
Owner

hzrd149 commented Jul 30, 2025

No harm in servers implementing this if they like but I don't think it helps the core protocol. blossom servers should be focused on storing the raw binary data, metadata like names, descriptions, tags, etc should be stored on a protocol that specializes in that. i.e. nostr events

@kehiy
Copy link
Contributor Author

kehiy commented Aug 7, 2025

@hzrd149 Doing a query to the Nostr relays and then fetching x tag from blossom will work great as well. The only issue is semantic searches won't work there.

We can:

  1. Use relays for static searches and keep this spec to only support semantic searches.
  2. Support all in this spec and let people to decide which to choose.
  3. Make supporting static queries optional in this spec.

What do you think?

@hzrd149
Copy link
Owner

hzrd149 commented Aug 22, 2025

Is there an implementation of this yet?

@kehiy
Copy link
Contributor Author

kehiy commented Aug 22, 2025

@hzrd149 no, but I can work on proof of concepts.

@kehiy
Copy link
Contributor Author

kehiy commented Nov 18, 2025

Any comments on this? If you think it's out of blossom initial scope, we can just let people do it out of protocol spec as they wish.

A lot of stuff can be done and if we want to keep protocol simple, we can just let people know that they can do those stuff without a spec too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants