Skip to content

Conversation

kieraneglin
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure how this happened, but it looks like #253 was reverted in 43ec284. I suspect that's because I'm used to commits getting squashed before merge so I didn't consider how my branches would interact with each other.

In any case, this PR is just like the old one. I'll be more careful about my commits this time!

@BrandonShar
Copy link
Collaborator

This is bizarre... How did that not show up in #254 ? My only guess is that both were open at the same time and there was some caching in the diff?

Definitely something to keep an eye out, thanks for reopening @kieraneglin !

@BrandonShar BrandonShar merged commit 253acc1 into inertiajs:master Oct 12, 2025
33 of 34 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants