Enhancement: Support for RFC 9421 http signatures

[svendiedrichsen]

Is support for RFC 9421 HTTP signatures a sensible addition for the REST spec?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9421/

[mkarg]

I cannot see what the Jakarta REST Spec should say about this. Maybe you could elaborate what you want the Jakarta REST Spec to clarify here?

…

-Markus Am 17.04.2026 um 00:57 schrieb Sven Diedrichsen:

*svendiedrichsen* created an issue (jakartaee/rest#1341) <#1341> Is support for RFC 9421 HTTP signatures a sensible addition for the REST spec? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1341>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAM7PN27SI7V6B2U6B2TS4L4WFQM3AVCNFSM6AAAAACX4GR472VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZUGI3TQOJYHAZTSNY>. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[svendiedrichsen]

Nothing to clarify but to define. Define the way how REST integrates with HTTP signature and make this feature part of the spec for container providers to deliver.

[mkarg]

Do you like to post a proposal for a wording? Am 18.04.2026 um 11:07 schrieb Sven Diedrichsen:

…

*svendiedrichsen* left a comment (jakartaee/rest#1341) <#1341 (comment)> Nothing to clarify but to define. Define the way how REST integrates with HTTP signature and make this feature part of the spec for container providers to deliver. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1341?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAM7PN66EGEZQMCYGJ6JRCL4WNAUDA5CNFSNUABFM5UWIORPF5TWS5BNNB2WEL2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQXTIMRXGMZDSNZWHA32M4TFMFZW63VHMNXW23LFNZ2KKZLWMVXHJLDGN5XXIZLSL5RWY2LDNM#issuecomment-4273297687>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAM7PN3QSMY6H3F47MYHDWL4WNAUDAVCNFSM6AAAAACX4GR472VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHM2DENZTGI4TONRYG4>. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>