Skip to content

Conversation

@jtnord
Copy link
Member

@jtnord jtnord commented Jul 22, 2025

See JENKINS-67829.

downstream of jenkinsci/remoting#811

Testing done

Proposed changelog entries

  • The Jenkins controller now stores jar checksums and re-uses them for every agent rather then recalculating them for each agent. This will reduce the CPU load on Jenkins, especially at start-up when it has a lot of agents defined.

Proposed changelog category

/label bug

Proposed upgrade guidelines

N/A

Submitter checklist

  • The Jira issue, if it exists, is well-described.
  • The changelog entries and upgrade guidelines are appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developers, depending on the change) and are in the imperative mood (see examples). Fill in the Proposed upgrade guidelines section only if there are breaking changes or changes that may require extra steps from users during upgrade.
  • There is automated testing or an explanation as to why this change has no tests.
  • New public classes, fields, and methods are annotated with @Restricted or have @since TODO Javadocs, as appropriate.
  • New deprecations are annotated with @Deprecated(since = "TODO") or @Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "TODO"), if applicable.
  • New or substantially changed JavaScript is not defined inline and does not call eval to ease future introduction of Content Security Policy (CSP) directives (see documentation).
  • For dependency updates, there are links to external changelogs and, if possible, full differentials.
  • For new APIs and extension points, there is a link to at least one consumer.

Desired reviewers

@mention

Before the changes are marked as ready-for-merge:

Maintainer checklist

  • There are at least two (2) approvals for the pull request and no outstanding requests for change.
  • Conversations in the pull request are over, or it is explicit that a reviewer is not blocking the change.
  • Changelog entries in the pull request title and/or Proposed changelog entries are accurate, human-readable, and in the imperative mood.
  • Proper changelog labels are set so that the changelog can be generated automatically.
  • If the change needs additional upgrade steps from users, the upgrade-guide-needed label is set and there is a Proposed upgrade guidelines section in the pull request title (see example).
  • If it would make sense to backport the change to LTS, a Jira issue must exist, be a Bug or Improvement, and be labeled as lts-candidate to be considered (see query).


<!-- Bundled Remoting version -->
<remoting.version>3327.v868139a_d00e0</remoting.version>
<remoting.version>3328.vc16b_70495eb_9</remoting.version>
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

incremental of jenkinsci/remoting#811 ensure this is correct/released before merging

@comment-ops-bot comment-ops-bot bot added the bug For changelog: Minor bug. Will be listed after features label Jul 22, 2025
@krisstern krisstern requested a review from a team July 22, 2025 12:14
jtnord added a commit to jenkinsci/acceptance-test-harness that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Please take a moment and address the merge conflicts of your pull request. Thanks!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the unresolved-merge-conflict There is a merge conflict with the target branch. label Sep 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug For changelog: Minor bug. Will be listed after features unresolved-merge-conflict There is a merge conflict with the target branch.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant