Skip to content

Conversation

@akhilputhiry
Copy link

See jupyterhub/kubespawner#272 for details

@akhilputhiry
Copy link
Author

@minrk Let me know your thoughts

@rkdarst
Copy link
Contributor

rkdarst commented Oct 22, 2018

Note: duplicate of #21.

This method would require Python 3.5, and then we'll have to update batchspawner requirements to 3.5 in most cases. I don't mind and it would solve some other problems, but others would rather us support 3.4 longer.

@rkdarst
Copy link
Contributor

rkdarst commented Jun 18, 2019

Now batchspawner doesn't support python3.4, but should this require 3.5 too? That seems to be the main choice between this and #21.

This could be modified to handle the case of no child spawner yet (probably rare but perhaps useful), and then to directly return the child spawner method instead of running through a new generator. But that's basically #21...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants